This essay focuses on Authoritarian leadership styles. Authoritarian leadership styles allow a leader to impose expectations and define outcomes. A one-person show can turn out to be successful in situations when a leader is the most knowledgeable in the team.
Writing instructions
As the world becomes smaller in terms of more cross communications and the need for more cooperation, leadership challenges continue to evolve. For example, most military operations are now conduct with the support of other nations, government and nongovernment agencies. Therefore, leaders are require to form consensus and collaborate with members outside their organizations. Based on the material discuss in this module, describe how the military can best prepare their leaders to be able to lead in a world with increase diversity.
In your experience, how do leaders inspire members that are foreign to their organization? Module Notes: Leading Globally in a Complex Environment As you begin to think about leadership within the military and via a global context, it is important to understand a few key principles that guide leadership within the military. It is also important to note that while the U.S. Military is world renown for its incredible depth of leadership foundations,
Authoritarian leadership styles allow a leader to impose expectations and define outcomes. A one-person show can turn out to be successful in situations when a leader is the most knowledgeable in the team. Although this is an efficient strategy in time-constrained periods, creativity will be sacrifice since input from the team is limit. The authoritarian leadership style is also used when team members need clear guidelines.
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Firstly, A very strict leadership style can sometimes lead to employee rebellion.
Secondly, It kills employee creativity and innovation.
Thirdly, It reduces group synergy & collaboration.
Further, Group input is reduce dramatically.
Finally, Authoritarian leadership increases employee turnover rate.