This essay focuses on  chapter 6 journal reflection.Directions: After Reading chapter 6 in Pearson etext Campbell 12 edition. Please write a journal to reflect upon the chapter content.

 chapter 6 journal reflection

Directions: After Reading chapter 6 in Pearson etext Campbell 12 edition. Please write a journal to reflect upon the chapter content. Journal reflections will be scored upon your thoughtfulness; not the length necessarily (though it’s unlikely you’ll have a very thoughtful and very short reflection). Reflecting on information learned helps us to store this information in such a way that it may be more easily retrieved when it is needed (like during a test, for example). Please provide a reflection of your learning and title it “Chapter 6 Journal Reflection – Intro to Biology” as appropriate; this helps me understand chapter and content you are intending to reflect upon. Your entry should contain a general summary of the chapter or of specific concepts (plural!) that you found interesting.  I have Uploaded Journal reflections examples of what I am looking for (example 2 will earn you the most point).

Your journal will be enhance by evidence of:

Progression through a learning journey. Evaluation of new approaches experienced in the period of independent study. Teasing out assumptions underpinning practice. Critical evaluation of your own practice. Analysis of key or ‘critical’ moments from independent study, whether positive or negative, and what was learnt from them.Sensitivity to relationships with other members of the group. Taking a position and making an argument from your learning experience. Relevant reading. New understandings made from: reading, planning and or delivery, collaborative activities, the exam, the viva, and the questioning of previous assumptions.

How will your reflective journal be assessed?

Ask yourself is there evidence of:

Effective organisation and presentation of material and or evidence. Academic reading used in a relevant way to inform, support and or shape your reflections. Critical engagement with, rather than description of, the creation of your ideas, or of the term’s work; your own process; and the process of others. Evaluation of the limitations/potential of the work undertaken.Immediacy – did you reflect every time you met for discussions/rehearsals; or after each seminar?The 17-point scale criteria will broadly apply.

A very good journal will be analytical rather than descriptive; selective rather than comprehensive; based in evidence and references to wider reading; critical and cautious in the claims made; personal but not rhetorical.

submission details;

Firstly, submit on time

Secondly, submit accordingly

Thirdly, submit today

Further, submit efficiently

Moreover, submit honestly

Finally, check time

Further, submit efficiently