This essay focuses on interviews with adolescent.And focus on the moral reasoning, and not so much in the behavior or its consequences.

interviews with adolescent

D.B. POST:  CLASS: Human Resource Management Thread Prompt: Choose ONE of the following (choose the one YOU are most confident writing about) 1. Do you believe that managers should be given more autonomy to make personnel decisions such as hiring, appraising, and compensating subordinates, or do you believe that managers should be given less autonomy to make such decisions? Explain and substantiate your reasoning.

The American psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg (1927-1987) continues the studies of Piaget.

His studies collected information from different latitudes to eliminate the cultural variability. And focus on the moral reasoning, and not so much in the behavior or its consequences.

Through interviews with adolescent and teenage boys, who were to try and solve “moral dilemmas. Kohlberg went on to further develop the stages of moral development. The answers they provide could be one of two things. Either they choose to obey a given law, authority figure or rule of some sort. They chose to take actions that would serve a human need but in turn break this given rule or command.

The most popular moral dilemma ask involve the wife of a man approaching death due to a special type of cancer.

Because the drug was too expensive to obtain on his own, and because the pharmacist. Who discover and sold the drug had no compassion for him and only wanted profits, he stole it.

Kohlberg asks these adolescent and teenage boys if they think that is what the husband should interviews with adolescent have done or not. Therefore, depending on their decisions. They provided answers to Kohlberg about deeper rationales and thoughts and determined what they value as important. This value then determine the “structure” of their moral reasoning.

Kohlberg established three stages of morality, each of which is subdivided into two levels.

They are read in progressive sense, that is, higher levels indicate greater autonomy.

Autonomous reasoning: Rules are the product of an agreement and, interviews with adolescent therefore, are modifiable. They can be subject to interpretation and fit exceptions and objections. The base of the rule is its own acceptance, and its meaning has to be explain.

Sanctions must be proportionate to the absence, assuming that sometimes interviews with adolescent offenses can go unpunish. So that collective punishment is unacceptable if it is not the guilty. The circumstances may not punish a guilty. Duties provided are conceived as given from the outside. One follows rules mechanically as it is simply a rule, or as a way to avoid a form of punishment.