This essay focuses on local geology beneath the instrument.and run the simulation you find there. To begin, in the controls on the middle right, select the box for “Barriers”.
a physics exercise and need guidance to help me study.
go to https://phet.colorado.edu/sims/cheerpj/forces-1d/l… and run the simulation you find there. To begin, in the controls on the middle right, select the box for “Barriers”. This shows the shaking amplitude recorded on 3 different seismometers from the M6.9 Loma Prieta, CA earthquake in 1989. All 3 stations are about the same distance from the earthquake. The south, but the type of local geology beneath the instrument influences the amount of shaking. That locationThen click
on the lower right side of the window. For now, the default values are OK (you start by trying to move a 200 kg filing cabinet over a floor where s = 0.3 and k = 0.2. Click on the filing cabinet and drag it to one side. You’ll see that it doesn’t move at first – the “Applied Force” display under the left side of the diagram has to climb to a large enough magnitude for movement to begin. From observation of the display, at approximately what value of applied force does the filing cabinet move? For the applied force I believe it is 585.75N if you could please finish the rest of the lab that would be great.
CA earthquake was more intense and cover a wider area than the slightly larger M6.8 Nisqually, WA earthquake.
The reason is show by the two cartoon cross-sections below. There was more shaking in the Northridge earthquake because the earthquake occur closer to the surface (3-11 miles), as oppose to the Nisqually earthquake’s deepe