This essay focuses on number of counterarguments.To speak of counterarguments is not to assume that there are only two sides to a given issue nor that there is only one type of counterargument

number of counterarguments

How is the thesis format? Is it effective? Does it lay out all of the main points that will be made in the essay? For example, consider the “Although because” thesis format.

Which includes a counterargument along with at least three reasons to back up the main claim:

“Although (some people*) believe I believe because and (*Don’t just say “some people,” but think about who those people are). ex: Although some scholars believe that 1984 is hyperbolic, and could never actually happen. I believe that Orwell’s Novel is already manifesting as we continue to move toward  and  (I don’t want to give too much away!. Think about how the novel speaks to our time and place in the world!).

To speak of counterarguments is not to assume that there are only two sides to a given issue nor that there is only one type of counterargument. For a given argument, there are often a large number of counterarguments, some of which are not compatible with each other.

A counterargument might seek to cast doubt on facts of one or more of the first argument’s premises,.

To show that the first argument’s contention does not follow from its premises in a valid manner. Or the counterargument might pay little attention to the premises and common structure . The first argument and simply attempt to demonstrate that the truth of a conclusion is incompatible. With that number of counterarguments of the first argument.

A counterargument can be issue against an argument retroactively from the point of reference of that argument. This form of counterargument – invent by the presocratic philosopher Parmenides. Is commonly refer number of counterarguments to as a retroactive refutation.

The proof of a conclusion depends on both the truth of the premises and the validity of the argument.

Also, additional information is require over and above the meaning of the premise. To determine number of counterarguments if the full meaning of the conclusion coincides with what is.

For Euclid, premises constitute two of the three propositions in a syllogism, with the other being the conclusion. These categorical propositions contain three terms: subject and predicate of the conclusion, and the middle term. The subject of the conclusion is call the minor term while the predicate is the major term. The premise that contains the middle term and major term is call. The major premise while the premise that contains the middle term and minor term is call the minor premise