This essay focuses on the American Sociological Association. -Each typed essay is one page in length, single-spaced, with 12-point fonts, 1-inch margins and topical headings. -ASA style (American Sociological Association) – There are pictures of chapters 1-2 for textual evidence to help aid you in the paper.

the American Sociological Association

-Citations and references are present in the American Sociological Association (ASA) style. -Each type essay is one page in length, single-space, with 12-point fonts, 1-inch margins and topical headings. -ASA style (American Sociological Association)

– There are pictures of chapters 1-2 for textual evidence to help aid you in the paper. TITLE: INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINOLOGY theories, methods, and criminal behavior (Frank E. Hagan / Leah E. Daigle) -Essay 3:Explain the differences between criminal justice and criminology.  Summarize the case of Anjanette Young.  Make an argument for how the consensus model of law, the conflict model of law, or the interactionist model of law explains the case.  Explain the differences between the Uniform Crime Report, the National Incident-Based Reporting System, and the National Crime Victim Survey.  Relate how you have been victimize by crime and explain why you did or did not report the incident to the police.

Police are primarily concerned with keeping the peace and enforcing criminal law

based on their particular mission and jurisdiction. Formed in 1908, the Federal Bureau of Investigation began as an entity which could investigate and enforce specific federal laws as an investigative and “law enforcement agency” in the United States;^[6] this, however, has constituted only a small portion of overall policing activity.^[7] Policing has included an array of activities in different contexts, but the predominant ones are concerned with order maintenance and the provision of services.^[8] During modern times, such endeavors contribute toward fulfilling a shared mission among law enforcement organizations with respect to the traditional policing mission of deterring crime and maintaining societal order.^[9]

Courts[edit]

The courts serve as the venue where disputes are then settle and justice is administer. With regard to criminal justice, there are a number of critical people in any court setting. These critical people are refer to as the courtroom work group and include both professional and non professional individuals. These include the judge, prosecutor, and the defense attorney. .  Offer a final decision to dispose of a case.

In the U.S. and in a growing number of nations, guilt or innocence (although in the U.S. a jury can never find a defendant “innocent” but rather “not guilty”) is decided through the adversarial system. In this system, two parties will both offer their version of events and argue their case before the court (sometimes before a judge or panel of judges, sometimes before a jury). The case should be decide in favor of the party who offers the most sound.  Compelling arguments based on the law as applied to the facts of the case.

The prosecutor, or district attorney, is a lawyer who brings charges against a person, persons or corporate entity. It is the prosecutor’s duty to explain to the court what crime was commit and to detail what evidence has been found which incriminates the accused. The prosecutor should not be confused with a plaintiff or plaintiff’s counsel. Although both serve the function of bringing a complaint before the court.  Prosecutor is a servant of the state who makes accusations on behalf of the state in criminal proceedings.  Plaintiff is the complaining party in civil proceedings.

A defense attorney counsels the accused on the legal process

At trial, the defense attorney may attempt to offer a rebuttal to the prosecutor’s accusations.

In the U.S., an accuse person is entitle to a government-paid defense attorney. If he or she is in jeopardy of losing his or her life and/or liberty. Those who cannot afford a private attorney may be provided one by the state. Historically, however, the right to a defense attorney has not always been universal. For example, in Tudor England criminals accused of treason were not permitted to offer arguments in their defense. In many jurisdictions, there is no right to an appointed attorney,

if the accused is not in jeopardy of losing his or her liberty.

The final determination of guilt or innocence is typically make by a third party, who is suppose to be disinterest. This function may be performed by a judge, a panel of judges, or a jury panel composed of unbiased citizens. This process varies depending on the laws of the specific jurisdiction. In some places the panel (be it judges or a jury) is required to issue a unanimous decision, while in others only a majority vote is required. In America, this process depends on the state, level of court, and even agreements between the prosecuting and defending parties. Some nations do not use juries at all, or rely on theological or military authorities to issue verdicts.

Submission details;

Firstly, submit on time

Secondly, be cautious

Thirdly, integrity

Further, ensure activeness

Further, proactiveness

Lastly, ensure tidiness

Finally, ensure independency