This essay focuses on the central themes that will be examine. Provide a solid and critical analysis of the information you are presenting by defining the concepts (in your own words).
Include a solid introduction to introduce the central themes that will be examine in the analysis .Summary of the case. Solid and critical analysis of the information you are presenting by defining the concepts. In your own words), providing thorough examples, and incorporating your perspective. PARAPHRASE, PARAPHRASE, PARAPHRASE. When defining concepts or theories, you are required to use your own words. Provide a solid conclusion: wrapping up all the central themes you just discussed in the analysis. Include references at the end of your post. PLEASE USE THE ATTACHED CASE STUDY TO COMPLETE THIS ASSIGNMENT AS WELL AS ADDRESS THE DISCUSSION QUESTIONS BELOW:
A theory is a rational type of abstract thinking about a phenomenon, or the results of such thinking. The process of contemplative and rational thinking often is associated with such processes like observational study, research. Theories may either be scientific or other than scientific (or scientific to less extent). Depending on the context, the results might, for example, include generalized explanations of how nature works. The word has its roots in ancient Greek, but in modern use it has taken on several related meanings.
, a well-confirmed type of explanation of nature, made in a way consistent with scientific method, and fulfilling the criteria required by modern science. Such theories are described in such a way that scientific tests should be able to provide empirical support for it, or empirical contradiction (“falsify”) of it. Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge, in contrast to more common uses of the word “theory” that imply that something is unproven or speculative (which in formal terms is better characterize by the word hypothesis). Scientific theories are distinguish from hypotheses, which are individual empirically testable conjectures, and from scientific laws, which are descriptive accounts of the way nature behaves under certain conditions.
, and are neutral concerning alternatives among values.:131 A theory can be a body of knowledge, which may or may not be associate with particular explanatory models. To theorize is to develop this body of knowledge.:46
The word theory or “in theory” is sometimes use erroneously by people. Explain something which they individually did not experience or test before. In those instances, semantically, it is being substitute for another concept, a hypothesis. Instead of using the word “hypothetically”, it is replace by a phrase: “in theory”. In some instances the theory’s credibility could be contest. Calling it “just a theory” (implying that the idea has not even been test). Hence, that word “theory” is very often contrast to “practice” (from Greek praxis, πρᾶξις) a Greek term for doing, which is oppose to theory. A “classical example” of the distinction between “theoretical” and “practical” uses the discipline of medicine: medical theory involves trying to understand the causes and nature of health and sickness, while the practical side of medicine is trying to make people healthy.