This essay focuses on the key analytical points and supporting evidence. degree of specificity. Secondly and more importantly, the paper should be a critical assessment of the readings. Engage with the readings and the authors

the key analytical points and supporting evidence

First, you should synthesize the key analytical points and supporting evidence in a succinct manner with a reasonable degree of specificity. Secondly and more importantly, the paper should be a critical assessment of the readings. Engage with the readings and the authors. Was the reading compelling? Helpful? Important? Lacking in something? Relate the reading to content of the textbook or external sources as deemed relevant. These are only suggestions. You can also focus on some aspect of the reading that caught your interests. The paper must be 7-9 (numbered) pages in length, double-spaced, in Times New Roman 12-inch font, and with one-inch margins. Students should identify and properly cite a minimum of 4 sources. Acceptable citation includes APA and MLA format, use foot notes instead of end notes. Papers will be assessed according to the following criteria:

Coherent Writing/Sentence Structure, Proper Grammar & Spelling, Organization, Accuracy of Content, Quality of Analysis, and Proper Use of Citation.measures a test’s ability to correctly generate a negative result for people who don’t have the condition that’s being tested for (also known as the “true negative” rate). A high-specificity test will correctly rule out almost everyone who doesn’t have the disease and won’t generate many false-positive results. (Example: a test with 90% specificity will correctly return a negative result for 90% of people who don’t have the disease, but will return a positive result — a false-positive — for 10% of the people who don’t have the disease and should have tested negative.)