This essay focuses on the right antibodies. For individual humanity by protecting the most fragile, not marginalizing them.

the right antibodies

Write a 950-1000 paper based on one of the topics listed below. Note, the only citations necessary are author date at the end of the sentence from the book “Living Ethics ” by Russ Shafer. Nothing at the end of the paper.

Must include specific references to this text from Mill, Hume, Kant and/or Aristotle.

Paper topics:  (1) The New York Times reports (here) that in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic Italian officials. Considering the possibility of determining who gets the chance of going back. To work and who does not on the basis of whether one has the right antibodies to the virus in one’s blood. The policy is ethically controversial.

However, Michela Marzano, a professor of moral philosophy at the Paris Descartes University,. Has remark that from an ethical perspective “the question of using antibodies. A basis for free movement reconciles a utilitarian vision of what is best for society with respect. For individual humanity by protecting the most fragile, not marginalizing them.

” Marzano’s remarks raise a few questions. How exactly does right antibodies Utilitarianism support such a policy?.

Can Utilitarianism be reconciled with what Marzano calls “respect for individual humanity”?. Is Marzano’s remark correct in the end? Defend your answers.  (2) Write an essay applying Kant’s Formula of Universal Law. The issue of social right antibodies distancing in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. First, clearly state the categorical imperative, and describe how we are supposed to go about applying it.

Then, describe a special case of social distancing that might be considered morally controversial (see, e.g., New York Times article here). And say whether you think the action would be morally permissible in Kant’s view. Do you think that Kant’s moral right antibodies theory gives the correct moral verdict on this issue?. Explain and justify.

  (3) Compare Kant’s concept of acting from duty with Aristotle’s concept of virtuous action.

What do these concepts have in common? How do they differ?. Which of these concepts does provide a right antibodies more accurate picture. The intuitive concept of a morally worthy/virtuous action (not merely a morally right action)?. Explain and defend your response.  (4) What does Kant mean by “acting from duty”?. How does acting from duty differ from acting in accordance with duty?.

What objection(s) do you think Hume would raise against Kant’s view of the moral worth of an action?. How would Hume evaluate Kant’s example of the sympathetic benefactor and sorrowful benefactor?. Do you agree with Kant that actions have “moral worth” only if done from duty?. Give reasons to support your answer.

Submission words

Firstly

Secondly

Thirdly

Further

Further

Lastly

Least

Finally

In addition

In conclusion

Cerytainly

Similarly

Meanwhile

However

Therefore

Likewise

Consequently

In short

Most importantly

On the other hand

Above all

As a  result